Filtered by vendor Synology
Subscriptions
Total
305 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2024-39352 | 1 Synology | 4 Bc500, Bc500 Firmware, Tc500 and 1 more | 2025-04-10 | 4.9 Medium |
| A vulnerability regarding incorrect authorization is found in the firmware upgrade functionality. This allows remote authenticated users with administrator privileges to bypass firmware integrity check via unspecified vectors. The following models with Synology Camera Firmware versions before 1.0.7-0298 may be affected: BC500 and TC500. | ||||
| CVE-2022-43931 | 1 Synology | 2 Router Manager, Vpn Plus Server | 2025-04-10 | 10 Critical |
| Out-of-bounds write vulnerability in Remote Desktop Functionality in Synology VPN Plus Server before 1.4.3-0534 and 1.4.4-0635 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary commands via unspecified vectors. | ||||
| CVE-2022-43932 | 1 Synology | 1 Router Manager | 2025-04-10 | 7.5 High |
| Improper neutralization of special elements in output used by a downstream component ('Injection') vulnerability in CGI component in Synology Router Manager (SRM) before 1.2.5-8227-6 and 1.3.1-9346-3 allows remote attackers to read arbitrary files via unspecified vectors. | ||||
| CVE-2023-0077 | 1 Synology | 1 Router Manager | 2025-04-09 | 6.5 Medium |
| Integer overflow or wraparound vulnerability in CGI component in Synology Router Manager (SRM) before 1.2.5-8227-6 and 1.3.1-9346-3 allows remote attackers to overflow buffers via unspecified vectors. | ||||
| CVE-2023-32955 | 1 Synology | 1 Router Manager | 2025-01-22 | 8.1 High |
| Improper neutralization of special elements used in an OS command ('OS Command Injection') vulnerability in DHCP Client Functionality in Synology Router Manager (SRM) before 1.2.5-8227-6 and 1.3.1-9346-3 allows man-in-the-middle attackers to execute arbitrary commands via unspecified vectors. | ||||
| CVE-2023-32956 | 1 Synology | 1 Router Manager | 2025-01-22 | 9.8 Critical |
| Improper neutralization of special elements used in an OS command ('OS Command Injection') vulnerability in CGI component in Synology Router Manager (SRM) before 1.2.5-8227-6 and 1.3.1-9346-3 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via unspecified vectors. | ||||
| CVE-2024-29229 | 1 Synology | 2 Diskstation Manager, Surveillance Station | 2025-01-14 | 7.7 High |
| Missing authorization vulnerability in GetLiveViewPath webapi component in Synology Surveillance Station before 9.2.0-9289 and 9.2.0-11289 allows remote authenticated users to obtain sensitive information via unspecified vectors. | ||||
| CVE-2024-29228 | 1 Synology | 2 Diskstation Manager, Surveillance Station | 2025-01-14 | 7.7 High |
| Missing authorization vulnerability in GetStmUrlPath webapi component in Synology Surveillance Station before 9.2.0-9289 and 9.2.0-11289 allows remote authenticated users to obtain sensitive information via unspecified vectors. | ||||
| CVE-2020-27650 | 1 Synology | 3 Diskstation Manager, Skynas, Skynas Firmware | 2025-01-14 | 5.8 Medium |
| Synology DiskStation Manager (DSM) before 6.2.3-25426-2 does not set the Secure flag for the session cookie in an HTTPS session, which makes it easier for remote attackers to capture this cookie by intercepting its transmission within an HTTP session. | ||||
| CVE-2020-27656 | 1 Synology | 1 Diskstation Manager | 2025-01-14 | 6.5 Medium |
| Cleartext transmission of sensitive information vulnerability in DDNS in Synology DiskStation Manager (DSM) before 6.2.3-25426-2 allows man-in-the-middle attackers to eavesdrop authentication information of DNSExit via unspecified vectors. | ||||
| CVE-2019-9513 | 12 Apache, Apple, Canonical and 9 more | 25 Traffic Server, Mac Os X, Swiftnio and 22 more | 2025-01-14 | 7.5 High |
| Some HTTP/2 implementations are vulnerable to resource loops, potentially leading to a denial of service. The attacker creates multiple request streams and continually shuffles the priority of the streams in a way that causes substantial churn to the priority tree. This can consume excess CPU. | ||||
| CVE-2021-29084 | 1 Synology | 2 Diskstation Manager, Diskstation Manager Unified Controller | 2025-01-14 | 7.5 High |
| Improper neutralization of special elements in output used by a downstream component ('Injection') vulnerability in Security Advisor report management component in Synology DiskStation Manager (DSM) before 6.2.3-25426-3 allows remote attackers to read arbitrary files via unspecified vectors. | ||||
| CVE-2019-9518 | 11 Apache, Apple, Canonical and 8 more | 26 Traffic Server, Mac Os X, Swiftnio and 23 more | 2025-01-14 | 7.5 High |
| Some HTTP/2 implementations are vulnerable to a flood of empty frames, potentially leading to a denial of service. The attacker sends a stream of frames with an empty payload and without the end-of-stream flag. These frames can be DATA, HEADERS, CONTINUATION and/or PUSH_PROMISE. The peer spends time processing each frame disproportionate to attack bandwidth. This can consume excess CPU. | ||||
| CVE-2018-7185 | 6 Canonical, Hpe, Netapp and 3 more | 23 Ubuntu Linux, Hpux-ntp, Hci and 20 more | 2025-01-14 | 7.5 High |
| The protocol engine in ntp 4.2.6 before 4.2.8p11 allows a remote attackers to cause a denial of service (disruption) by continually sending a packet with a zero-origin timestamp and source IP address of the "other side" of an interleaved association causing the victim ntpd to reset its association. | ||||
| CVE-2019-9514 | 13 Apache, Apple, Canonical and 10 more | 44 Traffic Server, Mac Os X, Swiftnio and 41 more | 2025-01-14 | 7.5 High |
| Some HTTP/2 implementations are vulnerable to a reset flood, potentially leading to a denial of service. The attacker opens a number of streams and sends an invalid request over each stream that should solicit a stream of RST_STREAM frames from the peer. Depending on how the peer queues the RST_STREAM frames, this can consume excess memory, CPU, or both. | ||||
| CVE-2018-7184 | 5 Canonical, Netapp, Ntp and 2 more | 10 Ubuntu Linux, Cloud Backup, Steelstore Cloud Integrated Storage and 7 more | 2025-01-14 | N/A |
| ntpd in ntp 4.2.8p4 before 4.2.8p11 drops bad packets before updating the "received" timestamp, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (disruption) by sending a packet with a zero-origin timestamp causing the association to reset and setting the contents of the packet as the most recent timestamp. This issue is a result of an incomplete fix for CVE-2015-7704. | ||||
| CVE-2019-9516 | 12 Apache, Apple, Canonical and 9 more | 24 Traffic Server, Mac Os X, Swiftnio and 21 more | 2025-01-14 | 6.5 Medium |
| Some HTTP/2 implementations are vulnerable to a header leak, potentially leading to a denial of service. The attacker sends a stream of headers with a 0-length header name and 0-length header value, optionally Huffman encoded into 1-byte or greater headers. Some implementations allocate memory for these headers and keep the allocation alive until the session dies. This can consume excess memory. | ||||
| CVE-2021-27649 | 1 Synology | 2 Diskstation Manager, Diskstation Manager Unified Controller | 2025-01-14 | 9.8 Critical |
| Use after free vulnerability in file transfer protocol component in Synology DiskStation Manager (DSM) before 6.2.3-25426-3 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via unspecified vectors. | ||||
| CVE-2021-29087 | 1 Synology | 2 Diskstation Manager, Diskstation Manager Unified Controller | 2025-01-14 | 7.5 High |
| Improper limitation of a pathname to a restricted directory ('Path Traversal') vulnerability in webapi component in Synology DiskStation Manager (DSM) before 6.2.3-25426-3 allows remote attackers to write arbitrary files via unspecified vectors. | ||||
| CVE-2019-9517 | 12 Apache, Apple, Canonical and 9 more | 28 Http Server, Traffic Server, Mac Os X and 25 more | 2025-01-14 | 7.5 High |
| Some HTTP/2 implementations are vulnerable to unconstrained interal data buffering, potentially leading to a denial of service. The attacker opens the HTTP/2 window so the peer can send without constraint; however, they leave the TCP window closed so the peer cannot actually write (many of) the bytes on the wire. The attacker then sends a stream of requests for a large response object. Depending on how the servers queue the responses, this can consume excess memory, CPU, or both. | ||||